How will you gets sites to register while preventing spam sites from registering?

hassle of needing a tmux server running

What do you mean? What hassle??

Less than 2 months old, no thanks. Critical software like a filemanager needs to be battle tested for a few years before I’ll trust it.

Blindly trusting anything as a security barrier is a bad idea. That being said, there is a growing view among security professionals that containers are not sufficient protection against malicious code because it can directly attack the host kernel. This is not a new problem which is why most, if not all commercial container hosts have always used virtual machines to isolate containers from their bare metal systems.

right on

https://espanso.org/ might be what you are looking for. It works across all your apps.

I use navidrome and native clients and personally, I’m working on moving everything I do out of the browser and into native apps.

If you like using your app thats all that really matters.

only a crazy person would sideload a random apk from github

bot post

Moving core system components like that is a bad idea. Unless you audit every package you cannot know where it will violate an assumption.

I haven’t tried it but that’s what this says it does https://www.q4os.org/dqa014.html

it’s not a bad thing for devs to work on projects they want to work on

I totally agree. However, as soon as they turn that project into a pitch site I also think it become fair game to review it as such.

Yes and since midnight commander and numerous other similar file managers already exist, it would be helpful to understand why the author thinks this one is worth switching to from the one I’m already using.

For me, having everything and the kitchen sink built in is def a negative.

I wish projects like this would explain their motivation. Nowhere in the linked article or git repo is it ever stated why this would be better to use than existing solutions.

voidlinux

Its the wrong question. workload matters far more than number of users.

1 user can be too many or 1000 just fine, depending on workload.

Why do all of your posts read like an LLM wrote them?

good one, thanks!

Per the Gnu Coreutils NEWS file:

  All commands now markup option names in --help and man pages,  
  with bold attributes, and hyperlinks into the online manual on gnu.org.  
  The links can be configured with the --enable-manual-url configure option,  
  and the bold highlighting with --disable-bold-man-page-references.  
  At runtime all markup can be disabled with the TERM=dumb env var value.  

This has nothing to do with less (or bash or fish). It is a new behavior as of Coreutils 9.10. It is to preserve the hyperlinks in the help output of ls, cp, rm, mv, etc. In default mode, less catches these control codes and escapes them so you see the visual escape codes. If you use less --raw-control-chars then less is NOT escaping the control characters (just passing them through) and they get interpreted by the terminal as screen formatting codes.

Debian 13, which ships Coreutils 9.7 does not have the change and cannot reproduce the behavior.

I read every word of your screed. You are advocating for an Easy Button. You don’t have any details how it will work or why, you just want everyone else to change how they do things to your vague and unspecified plan for an Easy Button.