We don’t know if he cheated. That would mean his wife was unaware. They could have an open relationship

Or maybe … Under water!

But for real caves are a very problematic area and having something self driven solves many of them. I am not talking about big caves here but small ones that are liked by cave divers to die in.

Hm depends maybe for caves

Well it right in so far that what most ppl know as pizza was made in america

But why would you use ai to do that

I present to you this multilingual code based. It has now 5 different languages in it

Notepad++ is in my opinion. It just should be at the side in mid air supporting a big lever under cmd

Well … Sigh in short because it is meaningless.

As a condensed half true and a bit hyperbole summary: Usb-c is first and foremost just a connector definition. So getting a usb-c cable is basically saying you will have a cable with this plug and a specific wire configuration. But you can omit wires if you don’t need them and still have a USB c cable. So from the phyisical definition this means your cable can have a plug that connects into a socket and is not wired internally at all. You can still call this a USB cable. That is why apple usb-c cables are often unable to transfer data, for example. This is done for downward compatibility with the USB standard.

The USB standard defines the functional properties of a USB cable. Depending on which version, which can be any number between 1.0 and 3.2 or thunderbolt, you have different lower and upper bounds that are possible. Except with USB 1.0 to 3.0 you don’t have lower bounds, you can omit parts of the specification completely and you can still call it a USB 2 or whatever cable. This means just because you have a USB c cable it does not give you any information about it’s capabilities. Except if it is thunderbolt or USB 3.2 because these have minimum requirements.

Because the functional and constructional definition is so wide ranged the standard does not give you any meaningful information. Which means it’s basically useless.

See you have to be careful because with that approach you can get a USB c situation

Well yes but no with html5 a lot of JavaScript functions are now possible with html alone so a number of stuff like click or core jacking or even SQL injections into local databases are now possible with html5 even with JavaScript disabled

Tldr kinda yes

Well more bugs than human reviewers can confirm

I don’t think ppl are stupid most ppl are fucking idiots and that article is such dumb shit it did cost me some braincells

The fuck

That seems actually pretty helpful

I would further disagree that ppl don’t buy stuff out of ethical considerations. There are eggs from cage and free running henns. They are functional the same but free running hens have a better life, so ppl buy that.

The problem is not if it is ethical but if it is measurable or comparative more ethical

Tja. MIT ist for a long time now falling more and more into scientific nothingness and obscurity. Their pretty authoritarian style of the last decade started this and will just accelerate their further descend

Depends on the race condition. There are inter software race conditions that are basically a problem of wrong or incomplete definitions

That’s not true there is stuff like race conditions, galactic which energy beams, broken cpus, computational bit flips, ram bit flips and stuff like row hammer, just as an example list, where the computer is very likely to not do what you said and not do what you meant

Edit: depending what you do even https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_epsilon could be a problem

Most enviroments have stage variables in database so ppl don’t post into the wrong database