VioletTea@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 13 days agoElon Musk Tests What Nearly Half a Billion Dollars Can Buy in the Midtermswww.seattletimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down11
arrow-up1126arrow-down1external-linkElon Musk Tests What Nearly Half a Billion Dollars Can Buy in the Midtermswww.seattletimes.comVioletTea@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 13 days agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squareAssassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·13 days agoIf pills are to be trusted (hahahahaha), a sweeping loss.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·13 days agoNot watching polls, but watching the geographic distribution of incoming votes, and its a wipeout.
minus-squareNoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up7·13 days agoI don’t disagree, but Dems are disproportionately likely to vote early so votes at this stage are not indicative. At least unless you have voodoo-level knowledge of how the votes distribute over time.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·13 days agoI mean its not voodoo, its just disambiguating preference from attendance.
If pills are to be trusted (hahahahaha), a sweeping loss.
Not watching polls, but watching the geographic distribution of incoming votes, and its a wipeout.
I don’t disagree, but Dems are disproportionately likely to vote early so votes at this stage are not indicative. At least unless you have voodoo-level knowledge of how the votes distribute over time.
I mean its not voodoo, its just disambiguating preference from attendance.
A fitting spelling error.
Ha, I’m leaving it