• 0 Posts
  • 134 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 20th, 2023

help-circle



  • When denaturalisation for crimes is on the table, the question is where one draws the line between crimes one can be stripped of citizenship for and ones for which any citizens would be punished equally. The obvious point is where the crimes constitute some form of treason: if you fight in a war against your country on behalf of an enemy state, it’s not reasonable to expect to keep your citizenship.

    If one goes beyond this and just says arbitrarily serious crimes can cost the offender their citizenship, one has a slippery slope, with the forces of populism pushing down it. Let’s say any naturalised citizen who commits murder will be denaturalised and deported: after all, we don’t want foreign killers in our country. Then what about attempted murder, or negligent homicide? Or any acts of violence? Or drug possession (illegal drugs kill, you know), or tax fraud (it costs the hardworking taxpayer millions). Or just giving off the vibe of being a bad one.

    The “false basis” clause in particular opens up the possibility of denaturalising anyone who is caught not being on their best behaviour, if it’s phrased as them having lied in their oath of naturalisation. Of course, this would not be applied universally, but selectively.






  • Britain is a country that put a man on the sex offenders’ register for fondling his bicycle in his locked hotel room, which cleaning staff happened to enter while he was doing so. There, any sexual proclivity that’s not designated safely normal is considered potentially dangerous and proscribed, just in case. (After all, can you prove that someone who gets aroused by bizarre things you and I and the justices of the High Court cannot imagine as erotic won’t escalate from that to committing horrific crimes?)









  • “Socialism” can mean different things, from European-style social democracy or Keynesian economics to Marxist-Leninist totalitarianism. The Reaganites having spent the past four decades using the word to mean anything beyond an Ayn Rand pipe-dream of pitiless free-market competition hasn’t helped.