• 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 6th, 2026

help-circle
  • The use of the word “possession” with fentanyl should be an alarm bell for anyone.

    Those few well intentioned people behind Prohibition, the War on Drugs, and everything of that theme doesn’t want to or is unable to understand that substance abuse is the symptom of a problem and not the problem unto itself.

    Life sucks and can be suffocatingly cruel. Targeting those in possession without the modifier of “intent to distribute” or similar is just viciousness. Some prisons do have the facilities and capability to assist those with substance abuse problems but now these people have a felony burying them further and practically forcing them to use.

    Going back to the subject of symptom vs problem. I smoked cigarettes for over a decade and despite acknowledging they were killing me I couldn’t quit. The thing is it isn’t an issue of lack of will. I was one of the most disciplined and stubborn people I have ever met. Reality is that cigarettes and “refactor” or the tobacco/nicotine infused paper & leaf are the cheapest and fasting anti-anxiety, mild antidepressant, appetite suppressant, and the most potent accelerant psychoactive that you can legally buy in the USA. I addressed my root causes for smoking and that made it possible to quit, but not “easy”.

    People intentionally possessing fent are dealing with shit that most people can’t even comprehend. Sometimes it’s unrelenting physical pain and additionally, or just on its own, psychological afflictions. There are few or no drugs that take away what has been called the “hum” or shadow of schizophrenia and some forms of bipolar disorder. I don’t really understand that but I do understand those people aren’t chain smoking for fun.

    One last attempt to try and explain this to the ignorant. Imagine walking up to a cripple on the street who is just hobbling along, trying to get by, proceeding to kicking their feet out from under them, taking their crappy walking stick or cane away, and telling them god doesn’t love them because they’re a fucking cripple. Translation: Arrested and detained for possession, likely enduring physical abuse by the cops and other prisoners, slapped with a felony that ensures they are trapped in the gutter, and then after attending Alcohol or Narcotics anonymous and stumbling being shunned by their peers for being damned by God for being weak.

    Step 2 and 3 of the 12 steps

    1. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.

    2. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.

    “ It requires the greatest kind of wisdom . . . to know when to apply injustice. ” - Philip K. Dick


  • We haven’t actually done anything yet. We have picked people we believe will do the exact opposite of what the last batch we picked are doing.

    The big question is if the new batch waiver or foolishly think they will survive the decade if they follow the standard Democrat Party playbook of empty promises, appeasement, and spinelessness.

    The bulk of the other politicians in 1930s Germany didn’t have a good time after letting a psychotic minority party seize control.

    MAGA is a violent but relatively tiny party inside of a smaller political faction that survives through gerrymandering and exploiting our anachronic election system. The Nazis gained control because no one opposed them. The question is if the existing politicians will get out of the way and accept the mandate of the people.





  • Nixon died an old man in his bed.

    Practically everyone in government involved with the Iran Contra affair are free citizens or lived most of their lives in freedom.

    The Jan6 crowd battered and tortured multiple police officers protecting the capital. I believe on committed suicide later and another died of health conditions strongly correlated to their abuse.

    Imprisonment was really effective as a means for punishing those responsible \s

    Now depending on how things go, if the false flag national emergency is not stopped prior to the midterms, all of the people raping women and children in the ICE detention facilities in Florida & New Orleans, murdering people for the crime of existing at the wrong time & place, and who knows what else will go unpunished.

    Imprisonment as a means to an end doesn’t work.


  • I believe the “give peace a chance” is naive at best. The true irony is that the intellectuals and academics, who are usually advocates for non-violence, are historically the first to go.

    Get it over quickly, publicly, and don’t leave anyone alive as Antony demonstrated with Julius Caesar’s assassination.

    An example from our relatives - https://www.raffriff.com/blog/2022/12/alpha-male-baboons/

    The American revolution actually included a lot of what would be considered “crimes against humanity” with the more “benign” being tar and feathering targets.

    A recent example is an attributed source of annual “Pride fest” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots

    Last thing is a double point. As a child after an altercation with three bullies vs me where I fractured the leader’s skull, broke the nose of another, and injured the spleen of the third I was both never bullied again and actually had a really good life at school. Further, given that experience versus non-evidence based arguments to the contrary, I will never believe “talking things out” can work.

    Humans are animals, violent ones at that, and submission doesn’t have a good history of with a good outcome.





  • That voting system is indeed too idealistic. The ideal is that if 65% of a voting population votes for the more popular candidate of Party A, everything above the cut off would go to the next highest candidate that belongs to Party. That way 65% of the voting population is ideally represented by the same political Party.

    There are a bunch of problems with this of course. What if the 2nd candidate is under investigation for eating babies? Or who is to guarantee Candidate 2 will make the same policy decisions? No one would ever vote opposite of their party’s position! \s

    I believe Australia had an incident were almost no one voted for a politician but they still won. Vaguely remember that was ~20 years ago and a lot of people were not happy with that.





  • Initially I didn’t know too much about Newsom except some people somewhat passionately disliked the guy. After he shoved the age verification law (a national login system wearing sheep’s clothing) through I started getting an idea why.

    Disclaimer! Take everything below with a grain of salt as I haven’t spent time to completely verify it all.

    Newsom has also held a series of partially questionable stances on issues that paints a very stark picture.

    Newsom came out against the billionaire tax arguing it should be a national issue. Sure but keep in mind we haven’t raised the minimum wage since 2009 ($7.20/hour) and even when Democrats held everything, they didn’t pass a single payer healthcare, raise wages, or protect women’s rights.

    The excuse of Paramount threatening to leave is kinda crap. The studio sound stages and the industry built up around them is difficult to just uproot. But that said there are a few mini “holly woods” starting to really mature around the world that are a lot cheaper than LA.

    Another more subtle point is that one of the easier take away from Reagan and now Trump is that people vote for candidates who confidently promise to do something. By the time people figure out they’ve been duped, with both of these presidents we somehow ended up entangled with Iran. With Newsom he could do the “right” thing and stop a third of the US media industry being owned by an antidemocratic billionaire but then he would be blamed when the billionaires gang up to punish him by using him as a scapegoat for fuckery they were going to do anyway. Please remember to factor in that a big chunk of the USA voted for Trump, even if it can be proven that he did in fact steal votes in the swing states, he still got most of his victims to vote for him.



  • I guess it would have been harder to accomplish commercially a similar feeling that I believe Mass Effect 2 elicited.

    Mass Effect 2 major plot point

    spoiler

    All through one of the three games in the series, you’re fighting this intelligent hive species with a central overlord called creatively “The General”. Right before the exact moment of defeat, you find out that the General and therefore all of his people, had been under the direct control of the true villain in the story. You realize this as the now normal, non-glowing eyes, General looks around confused and confused. Then they’re gone with the blast wave.

    Starship troopers unfortunately had a perfect straw man villain with the bugs. It would have been interesting to see something like James Cameron’s tall smurf people as the antagonist in the story instead.

    Halfway to that and Starship troopers is the game Hell Divers 2 which has you being a literal suicide commando. If you die in the game, you’re character is replaced by a new recruit waiting in stasis. If you look and listen, the writers give you horrifying hints of the truth. One example is the intelligent bug species are fighting back because Super Earth had been using them as fuel for their star ships.

    That is unfortunately PVH’s mistake with Starship Troopers. There is no contrast to show how fucked up things are.