Nvidia is by far the most important hardware producer for AI components, even AMD is barely worth mentioning as competition. They have truckloads of trade secrets for both their consumer and business grade hard- and software.

Currently China doesn’t seem to be able to compete on a technical level with nvidia. If they get these secrets then building up hardware production that outscales nvidia by a factor of ten would be pretty easy for China.

Die wollen es ziemlich sicher eindämmen, damit sie ihre Daten teurer an KI Firmen verkaufen können. Je kleiner der Anteil an AI Slop desto mehr ist der ganze Datensatz wert.

Considering how often Putin has shown that he doesn’t care about any promises he made, talking with him is just a waste of oxygen.

Germany is one of the countries with the tightest privacy laws on a constitutional level.

The German government tries to undermine these laws pretty much every year in favor of “keeping the kids safe” and “catching criminals” by forcing a state mandated backdoor on every chat service. It gets stopped by some court before the law gets officially enforced, but some form of it was passed multiple times already.

Not to say that the graphenos claims are true, I haven’t heard anything like that as of now. But most German politicians and the current government especially don’t like the uncompromised privacy that such projects offer.

Considering that the German far right AFD had their entire Email history leaked like a month ago since all of it was stored unencrypted, I honestly doubt they get anything more secure working.

Whether you think that the output is half as good quality or not why the fuck aren’t you JUMPING at the chance to do that.

Two reasons actually.

1. Most people want to be productive in some way. Even if you don’t like your job very much, its a much bigger mental burden to sit around and do nothing than it is to actually work.

2. You employer isn’t going to pay you the same rate for half as much work done. It is that way now cause they have no idea what the actual productivity will end up being, but once the numbers are stable they will save as much money as possible. You will either be lucky and will work just as much as before with more but worse output, or you will be fired.

Passing out for half a second wouldn’t even matter since you cant steer or break either way during the boost.

I’m pretty sure creating and distributing a destructive computer virus is a crime

IANAL but as far as I know there are not really any laws against malicious code directly. You can be held liable for any damages you do though, at least if it was intentionally, since you are the creator and/or distributor.

Which brings us to the main problem: currently no one is legally responsible for an action an AI does

No business would ever use these due to the license nightmare these projects would create.

It still requires you to maintain the entire server infrastructure. Sure if you already have your server up and running either way then spinning up another docker container or whatever else you use is pretty fast to do. But building and, more importantly, properly securing a server stack just for mail is a lot of work for little benefit. And if it stops working for whatever reason you won’t even notice it since Emails just get send into the void and are forever lost there.

If you really want to go the extra mile to be more independent from big services, then buying a domain and using that with something like tuta is enough. You can still jump ship whenever you like without the workload of server maintenance.

deleted by creator

Consent withdrawal hat nach GDPR keine feste Form, sie muss nur eindeutig sein. Webseiten haben durch das ignorieren der Flag, nachdem diese bereits einige Jahre etabliert war, genauso gegen geltendes Datenschutz-Recht verstoßen, wie sie es mit ihren dark Pattern Cookie Bannern tun. In beiden Fällen interessiert es halt niemanden, der etwas dagegen tun könnte. Fast keine Website ist hier compliant.

Aber genau darum geht es ja hier. Ein etablierter Standard existiert, wurde aber bisher von den meisten Anbietern ignoriert (danke dafür, Kapitalismus). Die EU braucht sich nichts Neues einfallen lassen, sie müsste nur rechtliche Schritte einleiten, gegen alle Seiten, die den Standard ignorieren.

Microsoft hat DNT ja in üblicher Dummheit im Default aktiviert, ohne den Benutzer entscheiden zu lassen.

Ausnahmsweiße hat MS mal was richtig gemacht. Privacy Optionen sollten bei Default Einstellungen aktiviert sein. Es würden eh nur Leute die Flag ausschalten, die davon entweder nichts verstehen, oder die auf dark Patterns oder andere Tricks reingefallen sind. Also genau die Leute, die am wenigsten solche Entscheidungen treffen sollten.

Die Flag hatte ihren Platz im Header und jeder Browser hat die Option angeboten. Aus technischer Sicht und auch aus Sicht der User war der standard etabliert.

Leider haben rechtliche Konsequenzen gefehlt, wenn eine Website sich nicht dran gehalten hat. Website Betreiber konnten die Flag bisher ignorieren. Wenn es Konsequenzen gäbe, wäre das ganze eine recht einfache Umsetzung.

A lot of the intelligent people know full well the reason why, but that doesn’t matter as long as the old and senile generation keeps voting for the greedy bastards that created most of our problems in the first place.

It shows volume, not density.

The amount of displaced water is the same for a lead sphere and a balloon of the same size.

You can the also calculate the density if you measure how mich of the object is submerged

The issue is that they can just reuse the existing art once they’ve “removed” the poison that was used on it. The artworks with poison in them aren’t forever inaccessible to them, they just get them slightly later.

That doesn’t mean we should stop, but it still is a war that we ultimately can’t win. Even if the poison technology advances faster than the AI companies are, they can simply use slightly older art with a less sophisticated version of poison.