Looking at the picture, hiking through that shows a level of commitment I doubt 90% of americans have anyway. That shit shows dedication, motivation, and most of all, complete fucking desperation, and instead of being helped, they’re being vilified and told they’re lazy criminals.
I’m not convinced y’all won’t swing just as hard to the right in a couple elections
If it walks like an enemy of the people, and quacks like an enemy of the people…
Imagine if people could do 2 things at once. What a world we would live in, if that was true.
See that’s where I think you’re fundamentally wrong. I think every single person has an intrinsic value, and no person is worth more than anyone else. I don’t think it’s up to the owner to decide what other people are worth, since his own worth would then be dependant on convincing other people they’re worth less.
I also think you’re showing the exact ignorance I’m talking about by arguing what you’re arguing. Ignorance isn’t about being retarded, or stupid. Every single person is ignorant about something. We can’t all know everything. You’re showing ignorance by arguing that some people’s lives are worth much more than your own, simply because they happen to own more. How many rich people are rich because they managed to create something worthy? And how many rich people are rich because their parents were rich, because THEIR parents were rich? Would you be able to be rich and make a great company if you started life with 500 million from your parents? If you did, would your life and comfort be more important than everyone else’s?
I think you’re fundamentally wrong in your assumption that any rich person has any worth, and I think it’s fundamentally wrong, that anyone’s comfort, life or access to basic necessities is less important than any other person.
Man A is abusing Man B’s ignorance of his own worth. Man A is also colluding with his competitors to make sure Man B can’t make more anywhere else. Man A is also always, always, ALWAYS, supressing Man B’s opportunities to unite with his fellow workers, either by union busting, or by lobbying to destroy the education system that would allow Man B to inform himself of his actual worth.
But I guess if we only look at billionaires with a 2 dimensional perspective, and ignore all the things they do to make sure their employees couldn’t possibly demand more money, then billionaires look like they’re just giving people job opportunities…
But if they paid their employees their worth, they may only have money for the next 20 generations instead of 40…
If the guy getting money for the toy, paid the people actually making the toy what they’re worth, there wouldn’t be billionaires. Your premise is flawed because you assume billionaires are good people who worked for their gains, when in reality every single billionaire in excistance has abused their workers, at minimum, by not paying them their actual worth.
Add to that the psychotic greed. When they reached say 500 million, why keep hording more money? They could lower the price of the product to the point of being a non profit, or paying their employees instead of themselves. They would never need more money in their life, but no, they’d rather hoard money, than let their employees live as comfortably as themselves.
There are no ethical billionaires.
Obvoiusly Greenland and Canada was planning to invade from the north, while Venezuela and Iran planned to invade from the south. s/
Is the commie infestation in the room with us now?
My exact thought about Patel. There’s no way he’s smart enough to flee at the right time, and he’d fuck up cutting a deal, by squeeling while negotiating the deal.
You mean instead of between Hilary and Trump right?
Jeffries and Schumer are employed by billionaires and Israel to make sure nothing that could harm billionaires or Israel will get a vote. Getting rid of the corrupt is the first step. The progressives are not going to get anything through, while the people in control are employed specifically to keep progressive influence away.
That is true. I do believe they need to be able to tell wether or not an specific employee has participated though, to make sure an employee doesn’t answer twice, or even 20 times. If a survey is 100% anonymous, with nothing tying anyone to anything, any employee could simply invalidate the results by spamming the survey. You’d need to be able to somehow tell wether or not an employee has answered more than once.
The correct and ethical way to do it is obviously randomised links, that can’t be traced back to the individual person, with no registration of who the links were sent to. Not that any company has ever done anything the correct or ethical way though. I’m just saying, there needs to be some way to make sure the results are actually an accurate repressentation.
Your answers may still be anonymous, even if they can tell wether or not you answered.
They know what they did, they want the people to believe they did nothing wrong, but the brutal democrat regime will punish them for fabricated crimes. You know, like republicans try to do to politicians like Ilhan Omar.
Just focusing on the one about marriage. Why are they concerned that a law about who can marry who, would have an effect on schools? Do they want to marry school children?
And they see a problem with Trump, not republicans in general. They’ll be right back to voting republican again next election (and probably the current election too)
In my country 67 years is currently the retirement age. Seems wild that, that would be just slightly above the average age for the senate.