Claude is a contributor to the repo on the main Github, but I didn’t see it as an author/co-author on any commits.

Might not be totally vibe-slopped

We don’t take pull requests. Have your agent open an issue describing the bug or idea, and our agents usually turn it around fast.

Last I tried, BSD didn’t like the WiFi on my laptop, so it’s currently a no-go for me.

Gonna survive on Linux for now, but at least I know I have a potential refuge elsewhere.

Because it’s not.

Obvious joke out of the way, I know PS is quite powerful, especially for basically having a bunch of Unix core utils basically built into one program, but I just cannot wrap NY brain around it. I understand it has a verb-noun structure, but feel like I can get more done in Bash than I ever will be able to in PS (I’m terrible at Bash).

Oh good, like Stoat before it. And Element before it. And Matrix before it. And XMPP before it…

It’s DSL (Damn Small Linux). I’ve played with it in the past, but I’ve found Antix or MX Linux to be easier to get up and going with unless you’re super strapped for storage space.

Plastic alternatives are in development and in various stages of manufacture. That’s a solved problem.

The other oil could/should be recyclable, which is a lot better than burning it, never to be used again like in an engine.

Imagine you’re building a house. It’s not up to code, the neighbor kids built the foundation, a mouse did your electrical wiring, and you can kinda hear some creaking when there’s a gentle breeze, but you have a house.

The only thing missing is a door in the wide open doorframe and you live in the sketchy part of town.

That’s what’s happening, except with AI servers.

Watch the video.

Window management is only one example of something that he thinks could be improved on widescreen monitors. He has three other demos of pretty interesting ideas, but the main point of the talk was to tell developers to begin thinking outside of the box in order to really drive innovation.

I’m an assembler at a Siemens Competitor; our devices aren’t PLCs and it wouldn’t surprise me if theirs weren’t either.

Most of our devices are full-on embedded computers that monitor and relay the information of gestures vaguely whatever devices our protective equipment are connected to.

The most recent version of one of our products is basically a webserver that allows customers to view realtime data of the connected devices and make adjustments where needed. Of course we try to make it as secure as possible, but software is insecure.

Also, my company tends to lag behind on “cutting edge” things like that, historically preferring to make products that have a solid historical backing, rather than chasing the new. If we’re looking into that side of the business, it’s highly likely that other companies have been doing it for a while.