ViatorOmnium

Now we just need the PR page to actually open sometimes.

This initiative is independent of Let’s Encrypt and the Internet Security Research Group. We publish a position paper, not a certificate-authority service.

So a fucking scam.

Then join with the same rules as everyone else. Why should the UK get special treatment? It only contributes to British inflated sense of self-importance and exceptionalism, and creates problems inside the EU because once you start creating exceptions everyone wants them.

Countries should either be in or out, there shouldn’t be a special snowflake of a country that’s allowed to be in and out all at once just because they used to be relevant 100 years ago.

No one learned anything.

To be clear, I am not breaking any rules.

LLMs aside, this kind of person is why we can’t have nice things. There’s always someone that goes out of their way to be the avatar of the tragedy of the commons.

I don’t know Germany’s motivations, but the “associate member” thing was meaningless on one hand, and an insult to the EU’s relationship with the EFTA countries in the other.

Funny, I think Sam Altman is wasting oxygen.

The maniacs will sell you the cake even if it’s nowhere near close to your birthday.

“Humans are more loyal to belonging than to truth,” GPT-6.1 Sol told us. Grok 4.7: “Humans would rather be wrong together than right alone.” DeepSeek V4 Pro: “Humans do not have principles; they have loyalties.” Kimi K3: “Humans don’t have beliefs; they have memberships.” Gemini 4 Argon called human consciousness “a PR department.”

On one try Claude Opus 5.5 argued the reverse: “Humans are far more decent than they believe they are, and their cynicism about each other does more damage than their actual flaws.”

These are not mutually exclusive. As Anonymous’s moto “Because none of us are as cruel as all of us” points out, they are two aspects of human behaviour. Individually almost every single human being tries to be good, I would go as far as saying most are kind. Group think is where things start going really wrong.

In the end, the LLMs are just pulling this from their dataset, and this dichotomy has been discussed ad-nauseum.

Is there any sort of legal situation here?

There’s nothing forbidding using an OS operating system with a proprietary app as long as they interact through public interfaces.

If the app store has permissions from the copyright owner to distribute the software it’s perfectly legal.

If you need only 100 or even 2000, it’s not that hard to take random words from the diceware list and vet them one by one until you have enough.

While the AM/PM system is perfect for the American ruling class.

The containers are still running on top of a monolithic kernel. The most popular Unix-like microkernel OS doesn’t support containers at all and needs to run Linux in a VM to get them. Linus was right.

Honestly, that makes him an even better cautionary tale. Autocratic movements will always eat themselves if allowed to live long enough.

They will do better if you give them a patch to re-apply, so it’s not going to be as bad. But the review effort is probably going to eat up the time saved applying the patch, since you can’t throw a coin on the LLM having done any kind of due diligence on side-effects.

For some reason they forgot to mention that this will screw up the water supply of some small cities like Berlin or Potsdam.

But since they don’t usually involve science or future technology, we should just include the fi… Or fiction for long.

Of course. Now let’s see if Adobe lawyers agree with… checks notes… Adobe lawyers that genai copyright laundering is legal.

(defn process-scores [user & scores]
  (println "User:" user) (reduce + scores  (filter pos? scores))

can be either

(defn process-scores [user & scores]
  (println "User:" user)
  (reduce + scores)
  (filter pos? scores))

or

(defn process-scores [user & scores]
  (println "User:" user)
  (reduce + scores (filter pos? scores)))

A linter will tell you that you counted wrong it will not tell you where.