The cheating is not exclusive to dudes though. Women do cheat a lot too. I wouldn’t say one sex “wins” over the other in that regard.

Microsoft’s is even worse.

1. Enter username
2. Enter password
3. Click “stay logged in”
4. Click “log in”
5. Login successful!
6. Page reloads to the username prompt
7. Repeat steps 1-6. Sometimes (but rarely) repeat them multiple times.
8. Now you’re actually logged in.

How hard is it to log in the user if the username and password were correct? If Microsoft can not figure out how to do this, why do other random websites work? Do those websites have some arcane knowledge being held away from Microsoft?

Also the bank:

Wtf are you doing m8? Why your password so fucking long? Keep it to max 6 characters, like a sane person.

You can. That key just does Ctrl+alt+F23 or something like that. You can remap that to whatever you like. In windows you can do so with powertoys.

Yeah. Npm definitively is safer than cargo /s.

Any non-retarded company would just verify that their dependencies are secure. And then self-host their own cargo repo to avoid supply chain attacks.

This is a company issue, not a language issue. And if it were a language issue, JavaScript would be worse anyway.

Even in the worst case scenario, it would be as easy as making the AI <div> invisible. Which is a 5 minute job. Well, for a bug tech company 10 hours, since they are horribly inefficient. But 10 hours is nothing in order to please a customer at the scale of Google.

The search is still there. It’s just pushed down by the AI window. Which takes a great part of the screen.

to win three by a little

Which means that if you miscalculate that “little”, you lose all 3. As the parent comment states.

Are there not any EU tea sellers? AFAIK, this only applies to small packets. An EU seller would buy big amounts of outside tea for a reasonable price, then sell it to you for cheaper than direct shipping.

Same. And it is the opposite of fun.

That’s inside the macro though. Whatever you parse inside the macro is defined by the creator of the macro. The macro invocation itself is defined by the rust language.

Rust allows you to use any bracket because it doesn’t know what the macro is supposed to do.

Some macros work like functions:

println!("Hello world");

Some macros work like array declarations:

let v = vec![1,2,3];

And some macros work like a code scope:

select!{
 a => myfunc(),
 b => my_other_func()
}

Since rust doesn’t know what your macro does, it just lets the user choose whatever the user sees more fitting for that specific macro invocation.

Funny that you put rust as the “uses parenthesis for function calls”. When in rust you can use any bracket for macro invocations:

let v1 = vec!(1,2,3);
let v2 = vec![1,2,3];
let v3 = vec!{1,2,3};

These are valid and have the exact same meaning.

I wish. Am European. I know one person that voluntarily uses their date and time formats. For reasons I will never comprehend.

Any formatter annotation just clutters the code though. Except maybe if it is file-wide.

I prefer that my editor formats it in a sensible way as I code. If there’s something I wanna do with a different formatting, I just do so. But the rest is formatted as I write it, instead of afterwards.

I wouldn’t say that vscode is awful. It’s not good though. Even while being the best.

To add: jetbrains IDEs are awful

Make it a recurring subscription instead.

10% of yearly revenue global for making a machine that lies (in a legally-compromising way) once per year. You want a lie per month? That will be 120% of your revenue for that year.

The numbers can be tweaked, but it should not be tolerated. Were I to misbehave and say what Google’s “AI” said, I would be in much more trouble than that.

This is basically the same problem as project names.

You can find a lot of made up words that don’t mean anything in mythology for example. Take names from gods (Greek+roman+norse will probably already get to 100.

Animals or desserts (like android) may appear in pictures. You can add mythical creatures to your list of gods though. Probably won’t encounter a minotaur in your photos

We already have the answer. We just don’t wanna do it

I unironically use PowerShell on Linux. It’s the only shell with sensible key bindings.

There is no saying. I didn’t say “always right”. Notice how I said “sometimes right”.

Customers are human beings. If I know I’m right (because I can see with my own eyes that the vacuum doesn’t work), and you treat me like that because “whether the vacuum works or not is not a matter of taste” I’m just never going to do business with you again.

As someone that has sent the literal exact same robot-vacuum-cleaner about 10 times for repair (because they just keep sending it back without doing anything): sometimes the customer is actually right.