

I can’t belive the models aren’t ai genned


I can’t belive the models aren’t ai genned


Atp, people should begin to acknowledge that their happiness offends these people
Denial? In 2026?


I don’t think a language should need to bĕ general purpose to qualify as a programming language. As far as issuing layout instructions to web browsers, it’s pretty solid wrt to execution.


HTML/TeX/etc are real programming languages that just happen to be declarative as opposed to imperative.


Nominal typing was a premature optimization. Product types should be structural and row polymorphic. And if they had been, dynamically typed languages nevdr would’ve needed to exist and wouldn’t have waited so long to smuggle types back onto their data structures. That said, i’m kinda glad shell scripting languages exist.


I like how i feel about you using “mate” and “cent” in the same post. Nou, I hate it.


might you even say “two perspectives of the same object”?


Fair point. Glazed over because I didn’t recognise the name. If you don’t mind me asking, work or pleasure?


Anthropic have engineers stationed in NSA offices


You spend a lot of time writing metadata descriptions for your photo sets?


Motherfucker wants to tech them to count once and for all


Tsoding calls it “software prostitution”


I don’t thing the fsf deserve to be catching strays on this


Start with a proof of concept distributed file sharing network
Expressiveness isn’t the problem. No doubt it can be less efficient and re-usable but constructed languages are mostly syntactical interfaces to subsets of the semantics we express in natural languages all the time. By using them we can precisely express combinations that can be difficult to convey in natural languages without losing time to perspecctive and interpretation but that can only a problem if you’re in a hurry. In most cases, it’d be far more limiting to have to express natural semantics in a constructed language than the other way around. What’s more is that all the orimitives of these languages are developed using the same strategies we use in natural languages. It’s just the morphs and structures that differ.


Because you know what he’s talking about and aren’t actually addressing the problems in question.


This isn’t wrong, but it isn’t relevant either.
Have you ever considered a career in set theory?