

that’s what the reps said in the beginning too.
sw engineer, firefighter, anarchist.


that’s what the reps said in the beginning too.
Andrew Beyer’s horse racing book “On Speed” (from the 70/80’s iirc?) showed that a long while ago the basic math for the stock market is very much similar to how paramutual horse / dog betting works.
it is gambling all the way down.


because he’s a fascist criminal and the US is run by them. So he’ll prob run for office somewhere here.


since when can a gov ban someone from saying something? oh. right.


surprised that things done with a gov are political? lol.
been the plan all along. Smith knew what he was talking about.


downvotes for suggesting the system needs to be put down? ok. ✅


i run mine through wireguard, but also think i do have its port open to the wider web using the plex signon they push. i’m prob fucked huh?
pfft. turned off remote access and the port forward. checked svr for exploit. updated plex. updated wireguard while at it. dont need remote access anyway.


what makes you think i don’t use ai?


get back to the scarf! i have a blanket im working on too lol.
but yeah. i think from our sw/eng industry, ai is at the least the one with the steepest destructive “curve”, i suppose.
ty for your reply.


none of those are examples of things in our current era doing as much damage as ai lol. can you not comprehend the comment i made?


yes. indeed. two things can be true at once.


the newst tool happens to be the one doing the most destruction, so… yes.
also: i do knit, lol. just a coincidence in example.


the thing is - no other tool (currently yall_cant_read) in our industry, and others, out there involves as much active destruction in both the working class and environment in its use.
that’s it. that’s the bit.
for those not understanding: the word “in” above implies in current use not that i am comparing AI’s effects with the invention of knitting machines or electricity.


same reason why i got flandish.hugedong.
hey you can’t use that word, only we can.


fair thoughts. thanks for the reply! i would rather learn from examples when it comes to actual stuff like this. history is great! fiction is too! i guess i’m just a documentary nerd. lol
i always like to reply “I’ll support if you STOP supporting genocide.”
then their regex picks up “STOP” and the next text is them saying i am unsubbed.
it’s the little things in life.


for sure. i just wonder how often it makes the jump from “drama on tv” to “oh wait this is based on a real event…” and then “lemme research that.”
a silly aside but thats how i found a lot of classic movies: the simpsons. bart of darkness being a take on “rear window” etc.
“vote harder” is our next step, right?