No classes, no mutable types, pure functions where possible (I/O functions exist). I like elixir myself. I use for loops or recursion depending on which is suitable and most understandable. I like the pipe operator because I’ve gotten used to chaining inputs and outputs like that from Linux CLI.
I prefer functional programming, but also use OO, each their own, but i prefer functional and find it better to write and read
Nah, no language is “perfect” once you’ve used it enough I write python for money and elixir in my own time. I borrow implementation approaches from functional when it’s appropriate. Avoid using complex classes, especially if the encapsulate state. But they have their uses and people should chose which works best for their use case
I wouldn’t write cli tools in elixir for example.
There are no objects in a pure functional language. No mutable types. Could you give an example of what you mean please?
Functional is better than object orientated programming
Freshhrss with a configured share to a bookmark service like linkding? Is that what you are looking for?
To complement this excellent post, The Mentor’s Hacker’ Manifesto
Automation has never been about easing the load and giving people more time off. It is about the capitalist greed of more in less time and this less money
And to just outright state this means this guy should just fuck off please.
That said, unlike answers from an LLM, SO answers are available for public review and scrutiny (for better or worse) which can filter out unhelpful answers.