No idea how Session works, sorry

There’s nothing technical about it though. Snikket/xmpp or matrix will require more technical steps for you as a hoster and for other kids to create accounts and add each other in groups

I would go with Deltachat. There is no public directory of anything, so it’s impossible to know who is/isn’t there or randomly contact anyone. The only ways to start a conversation/follow someone are:

• scan qr codes, so you need physical presence and it’s easy to see when there is no consent
• clicking on a random link

It i safe to tell your kids to not click on random links, so it’s the safest way for kids to not randomly come into contact of people

Looking at self-hosting I would rather go with chatmail, part of the deltachat ecosystem. Contrary to others the account doesn’t live on the server but on devices: a server going down merely affects connectivity, not the whole identity. Moreover servers are made to be redundant such that messages can transit through pretty much any of them. So when one goes down the app switches to another one and the downtime is invisible

I don’t understand why you want to introduce fqb, syncthing seems to be enough for your usecase ?

https://pollen.cl/

Made by a french company pushing for more libre software out there. They’re the ones behind https://copiepublique.fr/en/

This is exactly what git-annex was built for:

https://git-annex.branchable.com/

use case: The Archivist

Bob has many drives to archive his data, most of them kept offline, in a safe place.

With git-annex, Bob has a single directory tree that includes all his files, even if their content is being stored offline. He can reorganize his files using that tree, committing new versions to git, without worry about accidentally deleting anything.

When Bob needs access to some files, git-annex can tell him which drive(s) they’re on, and easily make them available. Indeed, every drive knows what is on every other drive.

gotcha ! Thanks

I see you want to sink me under a lot of points, allow me to do the same:

1. You’d have to be really naive to think that a project contains four AGENTS.md files and pretend AI wasn’t used
2. .editorconfig is, at it says, a config for editors. You can pretty much infer that an editor was used, but you can’t say which. Just like an AGENTS.md indicates an AI was used, or is expected to be used, but you can’t know which one
3. I said this project is AI-oriented, which the phrase you cite conforts.
4. No one here is saying that Claude coded it. I raised the point because I assume AI was used, and this is what the policy talks about
5. “Your promotional post” talks about the post, not the project
6. “If you are promoting a project” talks about you promoting the project, meaning the post, not the project
7. This is /c/selfhosted on lemmy.world. Other communities have other rules. The post you point to is made in another community, it’s irrelevant here.
8. This is /c/selfhosted on lemmy.world. I’m asking the question in the community. Note that my instance isn’t lemmy.world.
9. The discussion isn’t stickied nor linked from the rules. But it does exist

Shall we next audit every IDE autocomplete suggestion the dev ever accepted, look at their CV, review their commit history and inspect what they ate for lunch?

Is it possible to discuss as adults or do you have to resort to absurd arguments ?

I assume that the tags don’t exist but to convey information. The information is relevant whether the author of the post is the author of the project or not, that’s why I asked for it.

If you want my opinion on something that, as you said, as already be decided: if it’s too complicated to know whether AI was used, then flag it as AIP. There will be issues, just like any decision, but it will be a different set of issues. But are you really interested in my opinion or do you just want to pretend differing opinions are absurd ?

Or can we just share cool things we find and let end users make up their own minds?

That wouldn’t be in the spirit of disclosure, the one that was accepted by the community and for which you pinged a moderator now would it

What would I report it for ? It’s perfectly fine for the author to modify the title if it is needed no ?

Just like the discussion last time on this - every user will not be able to be a forensically review.

I didn’t see it ! Sorry about that.

Just like the discussion last time on this - every user will not be able to be a forensically review.

AGENTS.md in a repository are used to guide development. The very file talks about using typescript; you don’t need typescript to use the app do you ?

So if you’d like to propose this

I was just asking for a precision, but that’s because I didn’t check archives enough

And I don’t see any option for how this could be realistically implemented.

I see at least one: if the project doesn’t have a clear no-ai policy, then assume it is AIP. But that’s not my proposition at the moment.

My personal recommendation is going through https://slopscan.ava.pet/ . It’s a simple analyzer, surfaces files and commits. It’s of course not perfect.

a project that used AI in development in any capacity. Disclosure is required for how it was used.

The number one sign, there is an AGENTS.md file: https://github.com/Zavy86/WikiDocs/blob/main/AGENTS.md

(There are actually 4, depending on the part the user works on)

The readme contains “ready for use with the LLM tools you choose” which is the reason I said “AI-oriented”

it’s not my project

But you’re doing the promotion of it, and I suspect rules need to be clarified here. The most important to me was to flag that AI might have been used here, and it’s not clear, whoever the author is.

EDIT: asked the question here: https://lemmy.world/post/52376145

This project is AI oriented, I think you should tag it with [AIP]

Yeah I’m using motd as well and it’s the best one, I only wish it wasn’t made with AI…

Quick question after you found happiness using IRC: was xmpp not enough ? I’m genuinely curious in case I need something like this

This list https://noai.starlightnet.work/list.html has a long list of projects explicitly rejecting AI and there are some in there I would place in the “big and mature” bucket

I think it’s a very good idea for reusing old, unused phones and make them useful again. No need to buy a phone for that.

This is the point where having a 24/7 up server is not the smartest thing to do and a device that is sometimes turned off is fine

Be aware that if you have a single machine syncthing won’t work.

Use any software that can do software merging, like meld, it does the job

If you’re not going to have many editors, don’t hesitate to look at https://feather.wiki/ . It’s a single-file wiki with everything embedded, so to modify it you actually do your changes then get the new index.html that you can push back to the hosting place. No server-side process, no scaling issues, SEO-friendly, portable, backupable, etc…