Riskable

Yes, we all know that stalking requires patience.

If the punishment is suitable for men, it’s suitable for women. Any other position is straight up sexist.

You need to be there as a patient, silly! Not just stalking people.

Trump fears his ARCH NEMESIS!

Better headline: Trump-approved Insane Person Crashes Cat-lovers Convention in Catastrophic Demonstration of Idiocy

To be fair, that’s the most honest reason I’ve ever seen for being forced to come into the office 🤷‍♀️

To be fair, they want someone who will fight for their interests 🤷‍♀️

Corporations should not be allowed to participate in elections in any way. It’s so wrong on so many levels!

More evidence that conservatives don’t actually want to increase the birth rate.

That’s the difference between checking writing and outputting facts. It wasn’t trained on your personal Steam library but it was trained on zillions of texts, including texts that describe how AI works.

Model temperate controls the randomness and predictability of LLM-generated text.

Sigh. They obviously didn’t use AI to check their writing in this article 😁

If you don’t know: The correct term is “temperature”, not “temperate”.

This is why AI is the best grammar/spelling checker to use: it’ll know that’s not the correct word, even though it’s spelled correctly and the grammar is fine.

It’s good that we’re giving animals hints about how to develop technology but you’d think we’d start by handing out matches or something 🤷‍♀️

Aw. He thinks the guy is magically delicious. Daydreaming about his pot o gold at the end of the rainbow 🌈

What’s it good for? I mean, beyond good ol SSH?

Webmin is still around‽

The arcade machines are superior because they can handle four at a time!

No, you misunderstand: They’re washing by passing their stuff through gauntlets.

It’s probably because, logically, if you trust the government, communism makes the most sense. In theory, it’s the perfect system.

I want to know how it recommended right-wing people should vote. Also, anarchists.

AI isn’t inherently unethical. The very premise of saying such a thing is flawed.

Is it unethical to use AI to find new drugs and medical treatments? To use it for physics research? What about regular research? Writing code?

Where do you draw the line?

Also, AI was used to design the current crop of fusion reactors and the full potential of that is only just getting started. If it turns out that AI solves all the issues and generates a working fusion reactor design, it’ll make every one of your arguments moot. Because that one achievement will be worth everything. It would “save the world” so to speak (from an energy/emissions standpoint).

Chatting with an LLM is less impact than driving a car. Think about that for a second before you say using it is unethical. It’s literally more negative for the world for someone to drive a car every day to work than it is to ask an AI to find something on the Internet or write a program in Python.

Or perhaps your underlying complaint is more about capitalism than it is about AI?

Put it into perspective:

• Everyone doing their laundry uses more water than all data centers combined. Golf courses also use vastly more water.
• Data centers use about 1-2% of global electricity.

People driving cars pollutes more as does global shipping, regular old consumerism, etc. The environmental impact of data centers is negligible in the grand scheme of things.

Now that AI is making open source software the most secure software ever written (the hard way, hehe), not using it to scan your stuff is now considered worst practices and basically idiotic negligence. No company that uses software or anything with firmware can afford to ignore it anymore.

There’s no way out of it. Accept the new AI reality and push for good regulations. Example: If we made it so that all AI data centers had to be powered via renewable energy on site that would allay most of the energy use/environmental concerns.