

deleted by creator


deleted by creator


People shouldn’t commit things they don’t know how
I don’t use AI, but I read people saying you lose interest when an AI writes it. You check out. So you have less understanding, and it’s not reasonable to expect people to have the same investment. So I don’t believe it is just a team issue.
your commits should be small enough that they are easy to review
Depends on what’s being asked by higher-ups. If there’s management pressure to commit fast, then, again, it’s not a team issue, unless you’re including management in the team.


Just because code isn’t copyleft doesn’t mean it does not require attribution or consent to being scraped by LLMs!
I am painfully aware. For my own work, I don’t use LLMs, but I’m not convinced I’m going to be able to do that at work. I’m trying to work out the details of what that means and if it’s irretrievably immoral. It’s not looking good.


Nothing in itself. I just felt it was antithetical to the intention behind copyleft to train on it then share the result.
It’s a good question, I’ll think on it more.


Dolma uses starcoder https://huggingface.co/blog/starcoder, which
are Large Language Models for Code (Code LLMs) trained on permissively licensed data from GitHub
so this might do. Thanks.


Alright mate, take your high horse elsewhere please.


I must stop buying from chain stores.


deleted by creator


deleted by creator
deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator
a great way to find joy in programming
I already had that, thanks Linus. Did you not?


deleted by creator


He’s right about the tool aspect of it, but, and I cannot emphasise this enough, it is not just a tool. Though we all bow (or salivate) before our fake materialist gods, and cast aside the beauty and relationships in the world, things are more than just their function.


deleted by creator


deleted by creator
Combine it with that OS that wipes itself when you enter an invalid terminal command.