We ceased using “spyware” to describe software because the category would encompass practically all commercial software. I guess “malware” might be on its way to the same destiny?

One written with claude code, so… I wouldn’t hold my breath

How much data is it? How often read/written?

What differences will exist between the two parallel versions?

Some future components will be published under the commercial license and will exist only in that build. Newly developed features will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for which license applies to them.

source: the page linked by OP, https://community.bitwarden.com/t/published-version-update-in-app-stores/102750/4

posted it. Got dunked on for AI slop

101 upvotes and 14 downvotes… dunked?

Anyway, I stopped reading and downvoted after the

Ipso facto, for all the AI “Akshually” pedants, I’ve tagged this as AIP. Politely go fuck yourselves :)

typing the word “politely” or a smiley doesn’t make a very rude remark any less rude.

Moreover, splitting the community into a pro-AI faction and an anti-AI one isn’t healthy (for the community, whether it’s healthy for you is a can of worms that I don’t want to open right here and now) and ridiculing the other “faction” can only radicalize things and we already have more than enough of that, both in lemmy and, sadly, also IRL.

So, personally, I donwvoted your post, not your project.

Yep, that’s what I described and any CA accepted by the client can do it

They don’t have your private key

What risk are you trying to mitigate, specifically?

If it’s the CA taking over your site, control over your CA specifically doesn’t really give any advantage to an attacker (they would have to hijack traffic and provide a new certificate - nobody will notice if the certificate is from a different CA).

Note that your CA cannot decrypt the exchanges between your server and its clients.

Didn’t read the article but I love the braindead chart:

FILENAME='birthday_0' $(cat command_ffmpeg_SYNCAUD)  

cat prints out a file without altering it’s contents.

If it’s important to keep the commands in a separate file, you could use sed to find/replace, or use eval, or use some external template engine (lookup “bash expand variables in file”).

What you probably want to do instead, I assume, is to replace the external files with regular bash variables:

filename="some-file"
command="ffmpg -i ${filename}.mpg -bla -blabla ${filename}.mkv"
echo "$command"

IDK what makes Eric Bailey prefer a cooperative to a non-profit, the article doesn’t explain it.

Unlike corporations, co-ops don’t have to be motivated by profit. Not needing to focus growth at all costs means co-ops can instead prioritize and incentivise things like preservation and cultivation. It is also a successful model of operation [links to a page titled “employee ownership”], one that even already exists and flourishes in the tech space [links to a page about a specific software consultancy coop that doesn’t publish a knowledge website].

I might be jumping the gun here, but… it would seem he doesn’t really know what the point of a cooperative is?

I agree.

Leaving so abruptly may not be the classiest move but it’s not like one can’t leave if he so decides.

The dev will be fine and so will void. Nothing to see here for now.

I’m not saying you are wrong (not saying you are right either), but… your comment sounds a lot like “trust me, I have a conflict of interest” :)

I love this Omarchy thing: it’s helping separate the wheat from the chaff.

I only wished there was a site that listed all the “bad” guys… they seem to be way more numerous than I imagined.

TIL, thanks!

IIUC the EUPL is more similar to the GPL that the AGPL (ie. there’s no “network use” clause)

edit: seems like IDUC - see comment below

is

: <<EOF
  text
  text
EOF

a bash-ism?

deleted by creator

I hope this is not against rules 4 and 6, but… I fear it might be?

If you want me to remove the post just tell me (or report it to the mods, of course).

I’m only sharing this because I found it very funny :)

That’s way too tame… I fear it won’t attract 8M in funding.

Jokes aside, the Christian commandments are quite lacking (insufficient) when it comes to contemporary morals… eg. there’s nothing forbidding discrimination or violence (short of homicide) or slavery or corruption or torture or neglicence etc. (and this is if one quite generously interprets “your neighbor” as “anybody else”, which is clearly not what the word means and which doesn’t explain why only some of the precepts have this “universal restriction”).

I always find it weird when people cite the commandments as a moral compass without integrating them with (very much necessary) additional prescriptions.