I think they should just create a policy where unmaintained software gets removed? Or flagged where it’s easy to filter out.
Most AI slop just gets abandoned, but a real developer who wants to maintain FOSS software long term with some AI assistance is quite a different thing.
He didn’t invent a programming language. He designed a framework for a programming language. I assure you the second one is a lot easier. It’s like a library of functions and class suites that make programming quicker and easier as the boilerplate code you’d have to write is done already.
They specifically aren’t vibing it though.
As they say it’s useful to find vulnerabilities which is true.
And as far as code they said:
Frontier models are very good at finding bugs but it requires an experienced developer to babysit it and extract the useful portion of the output. Important bugs are often found but mixed in with a bunch of low quality output.
Which is the opposite of vibe coding.
It’s fair to dislike any LLM usage. But it can have value. But it’s often coming from unethical entities like OpenAI and Anthropic etc
Another problem though is the best Flatpak store Bazaar’s Flatpak version is broken due to Ubuntu apparmor. There are workarounds but they don’t really seem to be doing much about it. There’s a deb version in the repos but it is currently very out of date as its a newer app with fairly active development
Why are 100% of your comments shilling for Organic Maps? Just curious.
https://itsfoss.com/news/organic-maps-fork-comaps/
Despite being advertised as a community-driven project, key decisions, including financial management, partnerships (with Kayak, for instance), and the inclusion of proprietary components in the code were made by a small group of shareholders, often without input from the broader contributor community. These shareholders have reportedly used the project’s donation funds for personal expenses, like holiday trips, raising serious concerns about financial transparency.
Which is why they forked CoMaps.
I wanted to. Seemed like my ideal Gnome distro since I have a lot of annoyances with Fedora bugs.
However it was even worse
I use a Bluetooth mouse and doing any kind of installs through Gnome software would completely freeze up my mouse and cause lag with it.
Unfortunate, because I’d like to use it but its too janky for my mouse I guess
I don’t disagree that it causes confusion and that people conflate the two meanings especially for those unaware of what it is supposed to mean.
And inherently as well being an unstable distro as far as package updates goes likely leads to it being “unstable” in day to day use as far as bugs etc obviously goes hand in hand which further conflates the meaning.
Stable vs Unstable does not mean anything to do with bugginess or prone to breakage.
It literally just means package version changes.
Stable meaning packages update slowly and only minor versions or security.
Unstable means packages update frequently including major versions
Inherently rolling releases are unstable.
My personal experience too is that Arch has been the best distro for lack of bugs and issues on my machines than Fedora or Debian etc.
deleted by creator
You either log off a hero, or you see yourself create another linux distribution, and having failed the first part, DHH has been pouring his energy into creating a new project.
That line sent me.
The upside to immutable is you can’t unintentionally change the system to break it. The downside to immutable is you can’t intentionally change the system to fix it.